The petrol and diesel tit-for-tat between the PL and PN is all deja vu, now it’s the roles which have changed, with the PL in government and the PN in opposition.

“The controversy is just the usual PL vs PN rhetoric which panders to the most partisan and blinkered party supporters”, said Ralph Cassar, AD spokesperson for energy, transport and infrastructure.

“It is well known that hedging agreements can go either way: either in favour of the buyer or else in favour of the seller. Suggestions that in some way tax money should be forked out to lower fuel prices, is unacceptable and irresponsible. On the other hand this government must stop keeping information about contracts and agreements to itself. This kind of politics has been going on for too long, people have a right to be informed of the details of government negotiated contracts in whatever sector. This is more important than the usual and tiresome game between PL and PN.”

“AD believes in serious policies. As regards fuel, there is no guarantee whatsoever that prices will not shoot up again. Serious politicians will ensure that profits from duty on fuel should go towards, mitigating the effects of pollution like healthcare, urban open spaces, urban regeneration in areas destroyed by traffic such as Msida, Marsa, Hamrun, Fgura and Paola. It should go towards better public transport connections and more pedestrianisation especially in heaviliy polluted and congested areas, and towards schemes for cleaner modes of mobility, such as proper infrastructure for bicycles and electric bikes.”

“While other countries discusses climate change, pollution and the importance of a sustainable public healthcare system, PL and PN engage in schoolyard fights and their provincial and petty brand of politics.”